As he was transported at the Parisian detention facility on Tuesday, Nicolas Sarkozy posted a message brimming with resistance via social media, stating, "This isn't a former president of the republic entering prison today, it's an innocent man." An appellate court is set to rule on the veracity of that statement. However, regrettably for Mr Sarkozy, the spectacle and significance of his downfall cannot simply be wished away.
The French head of state between 2007 and 2012, the former president was found guilty of criminal conspiracy to secure prohibited donations from the administration of the late Libyan dictator, Muammar Gaddafi. Sentenced to a five-year prison term, he has become the first former leader of an EU member state to enter prison, and the first French leader since the dishonored head of the Vichy regime, the Vichy leader. Across France where the democratically selected head of state enjoys a almost king-like position, Tuesday's remarkable event was a defining instance.
In an era when confidence in political systems in France has declined drastically to the extent where alarms are sounding, it was also a instructive example that everyone is subject to the law. In a poll published on Tuesday, over 65% of those surveyed stated that they believed a large number of elected officials were dishonest, and the vast majority said that many operated primarily out of personal gain. While judging the former president and ordering that his incarceration should commence promptly, the presiding magistrate, the judge, said that she factored in both the profoundly severe aspect of the crimes and the fact that they were "could damage public confidence."
Such reflections might be considered unexceptional, particularly since that the ex-president has before been sentenced in separate corruption cases. However the former president's case and its fallout have troublingly exposed the degree to which within the nation, as in various states, the legal system is endangered by a increasingly common disrespect toward legal institutions and the try to influence of public opinion.
Following a populist playbook, an comprehensive and precise judicial procedure has been groundlessly presented by his backers as a courtroom scheme and leftwing vendetta. Subsequent to the decision last month, the former president publicly criticized his sentence as illegal and decried the "animosity" with "no restraints" that reportedly inspired it. Since prominent officials and supporters from the traditional and radical have saturated public discourse and traditional outlets with the identical arguments, the judge has been subjected to various menaces.
Reassuringly, the public does not appear to be buying it. A survey after the ruling found clear majorities backing both the proceedings of Mr Sarkozy's trial and his punishment. Yet the spectacle, and the obvious try to undermine the reputation of the judicial system, was very likely just a trial run. In January, the far-right leader's appeal against a guilty verdict for diversion of electoral finances will take place. Should she lose it, the conservative figure will be ruled out from running in the 2027 presidential race.
Across a fragmented and doubtful society, that will be a risky period for the national legal system to manage. Mr Sarkozy might eventually exit before his own appeal, following a request by his lawyers. However the unfounded and damaging assaults on the legal system at all stages of his case have established a harmful example.