Officials in Hong Kong have taken into custody thirteen people on suspected charges of involuntary manslaughter in connection with last week’s devastating fire, amidst increasing criticism over the detentions of citizens calling for responsibility.
Rescue teams persisted in combing through the seven towers of the Wang Fuk Court residential area in Tai Po on the start of the week, days after the most fatal blaze in seven and a half decades. The number of fatalities rose to 151 and is expected to rise higher as the operation continues. About forty people are still missing.
The estate, housing nearly 5,000 people, had been in the midst of extensive renovations that have been linked to the fire’s cause. In the aftermath, public fury has escalated over reported previous safety breaches by the contractor working at the site and lax enforcement of safety codes, spurred on by disclosures that occupants had been complaining about the renovations for a twelve months.
On the afternoon of Monday, officials said the anti-graft agency had detained thirteen people over the tragedy so far, including the executives and an technical advisor of a contracting firm, and had “immediately begun comprehensive investigation along the lines of involuntary manslaughter”.
A top administrator stated that 7 of twenty tested specimens of the mesh netting used around the buildings did not meet flame-resistance requirements. Preliminary checks had found samples were up to code, but the official said the less expensive, substandard material had been put in areas difficult to access in order to evade detection, labeling it a “shameful act”.
“They just wanted to profit at the cost of people’s lives,” he said.
As accusations of safety lapses grow, alongside reports that government authorities had issued multiple apparently ignored cautions, residents have questioned why no officials have yet been held accountable. Instead, two members of the public were allegedly arrested by security forces.
A person, identified as a local student, was arrested over an online petition that made “four demands” for assured assistance for the victims and accountability for those at to blame, including any negligent or culpable public servants.
Local media said the student was detained for “seditious intention”. Law enforcement did not verify the detention, saying only that they “will take actions according to actual circumstances and in compliance with the law”.
Local media also covered the detention of a former district councillor.
Asked about the arrests, the security chief said there had been “inaccurate comments online” that were intended to threaten national security. “Therefore, we must take appropriate measures, including police action,” the secretary told a press conference. “Operational details cannot be revealed as they involve national security.”
On local online platforms, people criticised the detention of citizens. “National security must be prioritised even if the victims are still buried in the building,” said one.
Several users made parallels to the Chinese mainland. “The mainland, these crimes are termed ‘creating disturbances’,” said one commenter. “It’s usually punished with severe penalties. Stability trumps everything.”
Another said: “Since we are following the mainland’s approach, by targeting the individual who raises the question, no one will venture to question, and thus the city's administration will have no problems.”
The detentions came after warnings by national security authorities that they would crack down on anyone considered to be using the incident to incite “hostile” sentiment.
Prior to the detentions, officials had already begun showing heightened sensitivity to the community response. Following the quelling of earlier unrest, public assemblies have been strictly regulated. In the immediate aftermath, volunteer supporters quickly organized relief efforts, with many individuals employing cars and transit to deliver mountains of garments, food and other necessities for the victims.
Nevertheless, by evening, armed police were patrolling the area, and government officials soon assumed control from the community coordinators.
The appeal over which the student was reportedly arrested was initiated late on Friday. Its “four points” mirrored the language of previous campaigns but did not advocate political change.
The individual told reporters that he was only “putting forward very basic demands”.
“Should these suggestions are considered seditious or ‘transgressive’, then I believe I can’t predict the outcomes of anything any more, and I can only do what I sincerely think is correct,” he said.